Asberry v. Relevante, 1:16-cv-01741-LJO-JDP. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20190912768
Visitors: 7
Filed: Sep. 11, 2019
Latest Update: Sep. 11, 2019
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO DENY PLAINTIFF'S MOTIONS FOR RECONSIDERATION AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF ECF Nos. 161, 167 LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL , Chief District Judge . Plaintiff Tony Asberry, a state prisoner, proceeds without counsel in this civil rights action brought under 42 U.S.C. 1983. The court has referred this matter to a magistrate judge under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On August 23, 2019, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendat
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO DENY PLAINTIFF'S MOTIONS FOR RECONSIDERATION AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF ECF Nos. 161, 167 LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL , Chief District Judge . Plaintiff Tony Asberry, a state prisoner, proceeds without counsel in this civil rights action brought under 42 U.S.C. 1983. The court has referred this matter to a magistrate judge under 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On August 23, 2019, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendati..
More
ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO DENY PLAINTIFF'S MOTIONS FOR RECONSIDERATION AND INJUNCTIVE RELIEF
ECF Nos. 161, 167
LAWRENCE J. O'NEILL, Chief District Judge.
Plaintiff Tony Asberry, a state prisoner, proceeds without counsel in this civil rights action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The court has referred this matter to a magistrate judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On August 23, 2019, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations that the court deny plaintiff's motions for reconsideration and injunctive relief. ECF No. 175. Petitioner has filed timely objections. ECF No. 176.
In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 304, this court has conducted a de novo review of this case. Having carefully reviewed the entire file, the court finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and proper analysis.
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that:
1. The findings and recommendations issued by the magistrate judge on August 23, 2019, ECF No. 175, are adopted in full;
2. Plaintiff's motion for injunctive relief, ECF No. 161, is denied;
3. Plaintiff's motion for reconsideration, ECF No. 167, is denied; and
4. The matter is referred back to the magistrate judge for further proceedings.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
