Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

GMAC MORTGAGE LLC v. LIVINGSTON, 1:12-cv-01171-AWI-GSA. (2012)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20121127j02 Visitors: 13
Filed: Nov. 27, 2012
Latest Update: Nov. 27, 2012
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE JOINT SCHEDULING CONFERENCE GARY S. AUSTIN, Magistrate Judge. Because Plaintiff and the United States are involved in settlement negotiations, and because one of the Defendants (Charles Livingston) has not been served, Plaintiff and the United States request that in the interest of judicial economy, the Joint Scheduling Conference be continued by 60 days. IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Plaintiff and the United States, by and through their respective
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE JOINT SCHEDULING CONFERENCE

GARY S. AUSTIN, Magistrate Judge.

Because Plaintiff and the United States are involved in settlement negotiations, and because one of the Defendants (Charles Livingston) has not been served, Plaintiff and the United States request that in the interest of judicial economy, the Joint Scheduling Conference be continued by 60 days.

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between Plaintiff and the United States, by and through their respective counsel, that:

The Scheduling Conference in this action, previously scheduled for November 28, 2012, should be continued by 60 days to such time and date as may be set by the Court, and that the Joint Scheduling Report be due one week prior to that date.

ORDER

The Court having reviewed the above Stipulation, and good cause appearing,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Scheduling Conference in this action is continued to January 16, 2013, at 10:00 am in Courtroom 10, and a Joint Scheduling Report shall be filed one full week prior to the Scheduling Conference.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer