Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

SAHAJ-MYERS v. COUNTY OF EL DORADO, 2:10-CV-01974-JAM-CKD. (2013)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20130604744 Visitors: 12
Filed: Jun. 03, 2013
Latest Update: Jun. 03, 2013
Summary: SECOND AMENDED STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE TRIAL DEADLINES JOHN A. MENDEZ, District Judge. Plaintiffs NICOLE SAHAJ-MYERS, STACIE WALLS, and JONA SCHER ("Plaintiffs") and Defendant COUNTY OF EL DORADO ("Defendant") by and through their counsel of record herein, hereby stipulate and agree as follows: WHEREAS, the Court issued a Final Pretrial Scheduling Order on April 15, 2013 ordering the parties to, among other things, file motions in limine by May 31, 2013; file trial briefs, joint jur
More

SECOND AMENDED STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE TRIAL DEADLINES

JOHN A. MENDEZ, District Judge.

Plaintiffs NICOLE SAHAJ-MYERS, STACIE WALLS, and JONA SCHER ("Plaintiffs") and Defendant COUNTY OF EL DORADO ("Defendant") by and through their counsel of record herein, hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

WHEREAS, the Court issued a Final Pretrial Scheduling Order on April 15, 2013 ordering the parties to, among other things, file motions in limine by May 31, 2013; file trial briefs, joint jury instructions, and proposed voir dire by June 3, 2013; and lodge deposition transcripts by June 3, 2012;

WHEREAS, the parties attended a mandatory settlement conference on May 28, 2013;

WHEREAS, the magistrate judge who presided over the mandatory settlement conference requested that counsel focus their time before the commencement of trial on determining whether resolution is possible;

WHEREAS, the Court issued a modification to the Final Pretrial Scheduling Order on May 30, 2013 in order to assist the parties in complying with the magistrate judge's request [docket no. 188];

WHEREAS, the parties and their counsel have been diligently working on determining whether resolution is possible, and expect to have a final decision on that issue on June 4, 2013;

WHEREAS, the parties agree that continuing the current deadlines for filing motions in limine, trial briefs, joint jury instructions, proposed voir dire, and for lodging depositions transcripts will not prejudice any party, will not interfere with any other deadlines in this case, and will allow counsel to comply with the magistrate judge's request;

NOW, THEREFORE, THE PARTIES HEREBY STIPULATE, AGREE and RESPECTFULLY REQUEST that the deadline to file motions in limine, trial briefs, joint jury instructions and verdict forms, and voir dire is June 5, 2013. The deadline for lodging deposition transcripts is June 5, 2013. The deadline for filing oppositions to motions in limine is June 7, 2013 by 4:00 p.m. No tentative rulings will be issued on motions in limine.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer