Harris v. Macomber, 2:16-cv-0830 DB P. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180502g53
Visitors: 23
Filed: Apr. 30, 2018
Latest Update: Apr. 30, 2018
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER DEBORAH BARNES , Magistrate Judge . The Court, having considered Defendants' request for modification of the discovery and scheduling order to allow a sixty-day extension of the discovery cut-off and a sixty-day extension of the dispositive motion deadline from the date the District Judge rules on the Request for Ruling by District Judge on Order (ECF No. 37) and having found good cause: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: Defendants' request for a modification of the discovery and
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER DEBORAH BARNES , Magistrate Judge . The Court, having considered Defendants' request for modification of the discovery and scheduling order to allow a sixty-day extension of the discovery cut-off and a sixty-day extension of the dispositive motion deadline from the date the District Judge rules on the Request for Ruling by District Judge on Order (ECF No. 37) and having found good cause: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: Defendants' request for a modification of the discovery and s..
More
[PROPOSED] ORDER
DEBORAH BARNES, Magistrate Judge.
The Court, having considered Defendants' request for modification of the discovery and scheduling order to allow a sixty-day extension of the discovery cut-off and a sixty-day extension of the dispositive motion deadline from the date the District Judge rules on the Request for Ruling by District Judge on Order (ECF No. 37) and having found good cause:
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED: Defendants' request for a modification of the discovery and scheduling order is granted. The close of discovery and the dispositive motion deadline will be extended until sixty days after the Court rules on Defendant's Request for Ruling by District Judge on Order (ECF No. 37).
Source: Leagle
