Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Heiss v. Ford Motor Company, 1:17-cv-01330-AWI-EPG. (2018)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20180214b47 Visitors: 15
Filed: Feb. 12, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 12, 2018
Summary: ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF THE COURT TO CLOSE CASE (ECF No. 11) ERICA P. GROSJEAN , Magistrate Judge . On February 12, 2018, the parties filed a stipulation to dismiss this action with prejudice. (ECF No. 11.) All parties have agreed to the dismissal. In light of the stipulation, the case has ended, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688 , 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and is dismissed with prejudice. Concha v. London, 62 F.3d 1493 , 1506 (9th Cir. 1
More

ORDER DIRECTING THE CLERK OF THE COURT TO CLOSE CASE

(ECF No. 11)

On February 12, 2018, the parties filed a stipulation to dismiss this action with prejudice. (ECF No. 11.) All parties have agreed to the dismissal. In light of the stipulation, the case has ended, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and is dismissed with prejudice. Concha v. London, 62 F.3d 1493, 1506 (9th Cir. 1995) ("Even if the defendant has filed a motion to dismiss, the plaintiff may terminate his action voluntarily by filing a notice of dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1)."). Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to close this case.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer