Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Graff v. City of Tehachapi, 1:14-cv-00095 LJO JLT. (2016)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20160510838 Visitors: 11
Filed: May 09, 2016
Latest Update: May 09, 2016
Summary: ORDER TO THE PARTIES AND COUNSEL TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED FOR THEIR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE COURT'S ORDERS JENNIFER L. THURSTON , Magistrate Judge . On March 7, 2015, the parties notified the Court they had resolved their dispute. (Doc. 64) To allow sufficient time to finalize their settlement in a written document, the Court ordered the parties to file their request for dismissal by April 15, 2016. (Doc. 66) Despite this, the parties have taken no action. Theref
More

ORDER TO THE PARTIES AND COUNSEL TO SHOW CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT BE IMPOSED FOR THEIR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH THE COURT'S ORDERS

On March 7, 2015, the parties notified the Court they had resolved their dispute. (Doc. 64) To allow sufficient time to finalize their settlement in a written document, the Court ordered the parties to file their request for dismissal by April 15, 2016. (Doc. 66) Despite this, the parties have taken no action. Therefore, the Court ORDERS:

1. Within 14 days, the parties and their counsel SHALL show cause in writing why sanctions should not be imposed for their failure to comply with the Court's orders. Alternatively, within 14 days, they may file the joint request for dismissal.

Failure to comply with this order may result in the imposition of sanctions, including the dismissal of the action or an order striking the answer and entering default.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer