Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO v. HENRIKSON, 2:17-cv-00085-MCE-EFB. (2017)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20170221d79 Visitors: 13
Filed: Feb. 16, 2017
Latest Update: Feb. 16, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER GRANTING PERMANENT INJUNCTION MORRISON C. ENGLAND, Jr. , District Judge . 1. Plaintiff COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO and Defendant ERIC HENRIKSON, hereby stipulate that the Memorandum and Order signed by Judge on February 3, 2017, Document no. 27 in the above captioned case, shall constitute a permanent injunction based on the issues, facts, and determinations of both law and fact stated therein. 2. The February 3, 2017 order of Judge England is attached hereto as Exhibit 1 an
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER GRANTING PERMANENT INJUNCTION

1. Plaintiff COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO and Defendant ERIC HENRIKSON, hereby stipulate that the Memorandum and Order signed by Judge on February 3, 2017, Document no. 27 in the above captioned case, shall constitute a permanent injunction based on the issues, facts, and determinations of both law and fact stated therein.

2. The February 3, 2017 order of Judge England is attached hereto as Exhibit 1 and incorporated fully herein.

3. The Court retains jurisdiction to enforce its order and the permanent injunction stipulated to by the parties.

4. Plaintiff COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO shall file a request for dismissal of the above captioned action.

5. This stipulation was jointly prepared based on input from both parties and their attorneys such that no one party or their attorney shall be deemed the preparing party.

6. All parties shall bear their own fees and costs related to or arising out of this action.

ORDER GRANTING PERMANENT INJUNCTION

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT:

The Memorandum and Order signed by Judge Morrison C. England, Jr. on February 3, 2017, Document no. 27 in the above captioned case, shall constitute a permanent injunction based on the issues, facts, and determinations of both law and fact stated therein.

2. The February 3, 2017 order of Judge England is attached hereto as Exhibit 1 and incorporated fully herein.

3. The Court retains jurisdiction to enforce its order and the permanent injunction stipulated to by the parties.

4. Plaintiff COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO shall file a request for dismissal of the above captioned action.

5. This stipulation was jointly prepared based on input from both parties and their attorneys such that no one party or their attorney shall be deemed the preparing party.

6. All parties shall bear their own fees and costs related to or arising out of this action.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer