LITTLE v. MARCIANO, 2:10-cv-2490 JAM DAD (PC). (2012)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20120314835
Visitors: 7
Filed: Mar. 12, 2012
Latest Update: Mar. 12, 2012
Summary: ORDER DALE A. DROZD, Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. Defendants have filed a motion to modify the scheduling order filed in this action on May 19, 2011, due to the pendency of this court's February 1, 2012 findings and recommendations recommending dismissal of this action pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Defendants' March 7, 2
Summary: ORDER DALE A. DROZD, Magistrate Judge. Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. Defendants have filed a motion to modify the scheduling order filed in this action on May 19, 2011, due to the pendency of this court's February 1, 2012 findings and recommendations recommending dismissal of this action pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. Defendants' March 7, 20..
More
ORDER
DALE A. DROZD, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Defendants have filed a motion to modify the scheduling order filed in this action on May 19, 2011, due to the pendency of this court's February 1, 2012 findings and recommendations recommending dismissal of this action pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b).
Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. Defendants' March 7, 2012 motion for modification of the scheduling order (Doc. No. 32) is granted; and
2. The deadline for filing dispositive motions set in this court's October 4, 2011 order (Doc. No. 27) is vacated pending further order of court.
Source: Leagle
