Ford v. Ford Motor Company, 1:18-cv-00104-LJO-BAM. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180207797
Visitors: 7
Filed: Feb. 06, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 06, 2018
Summary: ORDER DENYING JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT (Doc. No. 6) BARBARA A. McAULIFFE , Magistrate Judge . On February 1, 2018, the parties filed a joint stipulation that Defendant Downtown Ford Sales shall have up to and including March 2, 2018, to answer or otherwise respond to the First Amended Complaint. According to the stipulation, Plaintiffs reportedly served the First Amended Complaint on January 24, 2018, after the action was removed to this Court o
Summary: ORDER DENYING JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT (Doc. No. 6) BARBARA A. McAULIFFE , Magistrate Judge . On February 1, 2018, the parties filed a joint stipulation that Defendant Downtown Ford Sales shall have up to and including March 2, 2018, to answer or otherwise respond to the First Amended Complaint. According to the stipulation, Plaintiffs reportedly served the First Amended Complaint on January 24, 2018, after the action was removed to this Court on..
More
ORDER DENYING JOINT STIPULATION REGARDING EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
(Doc. No. 6)
BARBARA A. McAULIFFE, Magistrate Judge.
On February 1, 2018, the parties filed a joint stipulation that Defendant Downtown Ford Sales shall have up to and including March 2, 2018, to answer or otherwise respond to the First Amended Complaint. According to the stipulation, Plaintiffs reportedly served the First Amended Complaint on January 24, 2018, after the action was removed to this Court on January 19, 2018. (Doc. No. 6 at p. 1.) However, a review of the Court's docket reveals that a First Amended Complaint has not been filed in this action. Therefore, the joint stipulation for an extension of time to respond to the First Amended Complaint is HEREBY DENIED without prejudice.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
