CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. v. ARISTA NETWORKS, INC., 5:14-cv-5344-BLF (NC). (2016)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20160616b16
Visitors: 18
Filed: Jun. 15, 2016
Latest Update: Jun. 15, 2016
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING CLAIMS OF INFRINGEMENT UNDER U.S. PATENT NO. 7,953,886 BETH LABSON FREEMAN , District Judge . In view of this Court's Order Denying Arista's Partially Unopposed Motion To Stay Patent Claims Pending Inter Partes Review (Dkt. No. 292) and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2), the Court hereby dismisses all claims under U.S. Patent No. 7,953,886, with prejudice. ( See Second Amended Complaint for Copyright and Patent Infringement, Dkt. 64, 36-3
Summary: [PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING CLAIMS OF INFRINGEMENT UNDER U.S. PATENT NO. 7,953,886 BETH LABSON FREEMAN , District Judge . In view of this Court's Order Denying Arista's Partially Unopposed Motion To Stay Patent Claims Pending Inter Partes Review (Dkt. No. 292) and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2), the Court hereby dismisses all claims under U.S. Patent No. 7,953,886, with prejudice. ( See Second Amended Complaint for Copyright and Patent Infringement, Dkt. 64, 36-39..
More
[PROPOSED] ORDER DISMISSING CLAIMS OF INFRINGEMENT UNDER U.S. PATENT NO. 7,953,886
BETH LABSON FREEMAN, District Judge.
In view of this Court's Order Denying Arista's Partially Unopposed Motion To Stay Patent Claims Pending Inter Partes Review (Dkt. No. 292) and pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(2), the Court hereby dismisses all claims under U.S. Patent No. 7,953,886, with prejudice. (See Second Amended Complaint for Copyright and Patent Infringement, Dkt. 64, ¶¶ 36-39, 81-87.)
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
