Stewart v. Brannon, 3:16-cv-04312-CRB. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20180711a35
Visitors: 23
Filed: Jul. 10, 2018
Latest Update: Jul. 10, 2018
Summary: ORDER OF DISMISSSAL Re: Dkt. No. 42 CHARLES R. BREYER , District Judge . The parties hereto, by their counsel, having advised the court that they have agreed to a settlement of this cause, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that thiss cause of action is dismissed without prejudice; provided, however that if any party hereto sshall certify to this court, within sixty (60) days, with proof of service thereof, that the agreed cconsideration for said settlement has not been delivered over, the foregoing
Summary: ORDER OF DISMISSSAL Re: Dkt. No. 42 CHARLES R. BREYER , District Judge . The parties hereto, by their counsel, having advised the court that they have agreed to a settlement of this cause, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that thiss cause of action is dismissed without prejudice; provided, however that if any party hereto sshall certify to this court, within sixty (60) days, with proof of service thereof, that the agreed cconsideration for said settlement has not been delivered over, the foregoing ..
More
ORDER OF DISMISSSAL
Re: Dkt. No. 42
CHARLES R. BREYER, District Judge.
The parties hereto, by their counsel, having advised the court that they have agreed to a settlement of this cause, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that thiss cause of action is dismissed without prejudice; provided, however that if any party hereto sshall certify to this court, within sixty (60) days, with proof of service thereof, that the agreed cconsideration for said settlement has not been delivered over, the foregoing order shall stand vacated and this cause shall forthwith be restored to the calendar to be set for trial.
If no certification is filed, after passage of sixty (60) days, the dismissal shall be with prejudice.
Source: Leagle