(DP) Williams v. Wong, 1:09-cv-01068-DAD. (2017)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20171114814
Visitors: 6
Filed: Nov. 13, 2017
Latest Update: Nov. 13, 2017
Summary: ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OPENING BRIEF (Doc. No. 81) ORDER MODIFYING SCHEDULING ORDER (Doc. No. 69) DALE A. DROZD , District Judge . Before the court is a motion by petitioner Bob Russell Williams, through co-counsel assistant federal defender Harry Simon and appointed CJA counsel Tim Brosnan, to extend the current November 20, 2017 deadline for filing his opening brief on the applicability of 28 U.S.C. 2254(d) to all claims in
Summary: ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OPENING BRIEF (Doc. No. 81) ORDER MODIFYING SCHEDULING ORDER (Doc. No. 69) DALE A. DROZD , District Judge . Before the court is a motion by petitioner Bob Russell Williams, through co-counsel assistant federal defender Harry Simon and appointed CJA counsel Tim Brosnan, to extend the current November 20, 2017 deadline for filing his opening brief on the applicability of 28 U.S.C. 2254(d) to all claims in t..
More
ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR SECOND EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE OPENING BRIEF
(Doc. No. 81)
ORDER MODIFYING SCHEDULING
ORDER
(Doc. No. 69)
DALE A. DROZD, District Judge.
Before the court is a motion by petitioner Bob Russell Williams, through co-counsel assistant federal defender Harry Simon and appointed CJA counsel Tim Brosnan, to extend the current November 20, 2017 deadline for filing his opening brief on the applicability of 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d) to all claims in the petition to December 18, 2017. This extension of time, petitioner's second, is necessary due to Mr. Brosnan's substantial responsibilities other matters.
Mr. Brosnan represents that counsel for respondent, deputy attorney general Craig Meyers, does not oppose the requested extension.
The court finds good cause to grant petitioner's requested second extension and thereupon modify the court's schedule in this case.
Accordingly,
1. Petitioner's unopposed motion for second extension of time to file and serve his opening brief on the applicability of 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d) to all claims in the petition is granted to and including December 18, 2017.
2. Respondent's brief on the application of 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d) to all claims in the petition shall be filed and served by not later than December 18, 2018.
3. Petitioner's reply brief on the application of 28 U.S.C. § 2254(d) to all claims in the petition shall be filed and served by not later than June 20, 2019.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
