JOINT STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT

KANDIS A. WESTMORE, Magistrate Judge.

On November 1, 2016, Plaintiff Marco Rodriguez ("Rodriguez"), filed a Complaint in this action, one of many Complaints filed by Plaintiff's counsel on the same day. Given the number of Complaints requiring a response from Experian at the same time, and in accordance with Local Rule 6-1(a), Rodriguez and Experian have agreed to an extension for Experian to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint to January 24, 2017. To the extent that Experian files a motion to dismiss in this case, for the same considerations, Experian agrees that Plaintiff shall have 30 days to respond. Experian will thereupon have 21 days for any reply.

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between Rodriguez and Experian, that the deadline for Experian to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint is extended until January 24, 2017, Plaintiff's deadline to respond to any motion to dismiss is extended to 30 days from filing, and Experian's deadline to reply in support of a motion to dismiss is extended to 21 days from filing the opposition.

ECF CERTIFICATION

I, Heather N. Fugitt, hereby attest pursuant to N.D. Cal. General Order No. 45 that the concurrence to the filing of this document has been obtained from each signatory hereto.

Executed this 23rd day of November, 2016, at Palo Alto, California.

[PROPOSED] ORDER

The Court, having considered the parties' Joint Stipulation for Extension of Time to Respond to the Complaint, hereby Extend Experian Information Solutions, Inc. deadline to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint to January 24, 2017.

PURSUANT TO THE STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.