Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Altair Logix LLC v. Ampro Adlink Technology, Inc., 4:19-cv-01596-HSG. (2019)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20191231864 Visitors: 13
Filed: Dec. 30, 2019
Latest Update: Dec. 30, 2019
Summary: ORDER TO DISMISS AMPRO ADLINK TECHNOLOGY, INC WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO RULE 41(A)(2) AND TO DISMISS COUNTERCLAIMS WITHOUT PREJUDICE HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR. , District Judge . The Stipulation to Dismiss Ampro ADLINK Technology, Inc. With Prejudice Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) and to Dismiss Counterclaims Without Prejudice, which requests dismissal of all claims and counterclaims asserted between Plaintiff Altair Logix LLC and Defendant Ampro ADLINK Technology, Inc., is GRANTED. It is therefo
More

ORDER TO DISMISS AMPRO ADLINK TECHNOLOGY, INC WITH PREJUDICE PURSUANT TO RULE 41(A)(2) AND TO DISMISS COUNTERCLAIMS WITHOUT PREJUDICE

The Stipulation to Dismiss Ampro ADLINK Technology, Inc. With Prejudice Pursuant to Rule 41(a)(2) and to Dismiss Counterclaims Without Prejudice, which requests dismissal of all claims and counterclaims asserted between Plaintiff Altair Logix LLC and Defendant Ampro ADLINK Technology, Inc., is GRANTED.

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that all claims asserted in this suit by Plaintiff Altair Logix LLC are hereby DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, and all counterclaims asserted by Defendant Ampro ADLINK Technology, Inc., are hereby DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE.

It is further ORDERED that all costs, expenses and attorneys' fees are to be borne by the party that incurred them.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer