Hyriten LLC v. Fine, 17-cv-06573-JD. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20180104996
Visitors: 14
Filed: Jan. 02, 2018
Latest Update: Jan. 02, 2018
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND REMANDING TO STATE COURT Re: Dkt. No. 6 JAMES DONATO , District Judge . The Court has reviewed Magistrate Judge Westmore's report and recommendation. Dkt. No. 6. No objections have been filed in response to the report, and the time to file objections has expired. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). The Court adopts in full Magistrate Judge Westmore's well-reasoned report and recommendation, and orders the case remanded to Alameda County Superior Court
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND REMANDING TO STATE COURT Re: Dkt. No. 6 JAMES DONATO , District Judge . The Court has reviewed Magistrate Judge Westmore's report and recommendation. Dkt. No. 6. No objections have been filed in response to the report, and the time to file objections has expired. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b). The Court adopts in full Magistrate Judge Westmore's well-reasoned report and recommendation, and orders the case remanded to Alameda County Superior Court...
More
ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION AND REMANDING TO STATE COURT
Re: Dkt. No. 6
JAMES DONATO, District Judge.
The Court has reviewed Magistrate Judge Westmore's report and recommendation. Dkt. No. 6. No objections have been filed in response to the report, and the time to file objections has expired. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b).
The Court adopts in full Magistrate Judge Westmore's well-reasoned report and recommendation, and orders the case remanded to Alameda County Superior Court.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
