IN RE NICKELODEON CONSUMER PRIVACY LITIGATION, 12-07829 (2015)
Court: District Court, D. New Jersey
Number: infdco20150123d20
Visitors: 21
Filed: Jan. 22, 2015
Latest Update: Jan. 22, 2015
Summary: ORDER STANLEY R. CHESLER, District Judge. This matter having come before the Court upon Defendants' motions to dismiss Plaintiffs' Second Consolidated Class Action Complaint; and Plaintiffs having opposed the motions; and the Court having opted to rule on the papers and without oral argument, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78; and for the reasons expressed in the Opinion filed herewith; and for good cause shown, IT IS on this 20th day of January, 2015, ORDERED that Defendants'
Summary: ORDER STANLEY R. CHESLER, District Judge. This matter having come before the Court upon Defendants' motions to dismiss Plaintiffs' Second Consolidated Class Action Complaint; and Plaintiffs having opposed the motions; and the Court having opted to rule on the papers and without oral argument, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78; and for the reasons expressed in the Opinion filed herewith; and for good cause shown, IT IS on this 20th day of January, 2015, ORDERED that Defendants' ..
More
ORDER
STANLEY R. CHESLER, District Judge.
This matter having come before the Court upon Defendants' motions to dismiss Plaintiffs' Second Consolidated Class Action Complaint; and Plaintiffs having opposed the motions; and the Court having opted to rule on the papers and without oral argument, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 78; and for the reasons expressed in the Opinion filed herewith; and for good cause shown,
IT IS on this 20th day of January, 2015,
ORDERED that Defendants' motions to dismiss [Docket Entries 77 & 78] be and hereby are GRANTED; and it is further
ORDERED that the Second Consolidated Class Action Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as to both Defendants.
Source: Leagle
