Filed: Mar. 28, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 28, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND FINDINGS AND ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE, AND TO EXCLUDE TIME UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT TROY L. NUNLEY , District Judge . STIPULATION 1. By previous order, this matter was set for status on March 30, 2017. 2. By this stipulation, defendant now moves to continue the status conference until April 27, 2017, at 9:30 a.m., and to exclude time between March 30, 2017, and April 27, 2017, under Local Code T4. 3. The parties agree and stipulate, and request that the Court fin
Summary: STIPULATION AND FINDINGS AND ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE, AND TO EXCLUDE TIME UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT TROY L. NUNLEY , District Judge . STIPULATION 1. By previous order, this matter was set for status on March 30, 2017. 2. By this stipulation, defendant now moves to continue the status conference until April 27, 2017, at 9:30 a.m., and to exclude time between March 30, 2017, and April 27, 2017, under Local Code T4. 3. The parties agree and stipulate, and request that the Court find..
More
STIPULATION AND FINDINGS AND ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUS CONFERENCE, AND TO EXCLUDE TIME UNDER SPEEDY TRIAL ACT
TROY L. NUNLEY, District Judge.
STIPULATION
1. By previous order, this matter was set for status on March 30, 2017.
2. By this stipulation, defendant now moves to continue the status conference until April 27, 2017, at 9:30 a.m., and to exclude time between March 30, 2017, and April 27, 2017, under Local Code T4.
3. The parties agree and stipulate, and request that the Court find the following:
a) The discovery in this case consists of several hundred pages of records, reports and photographs, as well as, an audio recording of the defendant's statement to law enforcement. In addition, there are two electronic devices, both of which contain material restricted by 18 U.S.C. § 3509(m). All of this discovery has been either produced directly to counsel and/or made available for inspection.
b) Counsel for the defendant needs additional time to meet with his client to discuss the evidence and a potential resolution.
c) Counsel for defendant believes that failure to grant the above-requested continuance would deny counsel the reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence.
d) The government does not object to the continuance.
e) Based on the above-stated findings, the ends of justice served by continuing the case as requested outweigh the interest of the public and the defendant in a trial within the original date prescribed by the Speedy Trial Act.
f) For the purpose of computing time under the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161, et seq., within which trial must commence, the time period of March 30, 2017, to April 27, 2017, inclusive, is deemed excludable pursuant to 18 U.S.C.§ 3161(h)(7)(A), B(iv), Local Code T4, because it results from a continuance granted by the Court at defendant's request on the basis of the Court's finding that the ends of justice served by taking such action outweigh the best interest of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.
THE REMAINDER OF THIS PAGE IS INTENTIONALLY BLANK
4. Nothing in this stipulation and order shall preclude a finding that other provisions of the Speedy Trial Act dictate that additional time periods are excludable from the period within which a trial must commence.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
FINDINGS AND ORDER
IT IS SO FOUND AND ORDERED.
