Garcia v. Service Employees International Union, 2:17-cv-01340-APG-NJK. (2019)
Court: District Court, D. Nevada
Number: infdco20190118a75
Visitors: 3
Filed: Jan. 17, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 17, 2019
Summary: Order [Docket No. 222] NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs' motion to compel. Docket No. 222. Defendants filed a response in opposition, and Plaintiffs filed a reply. Docket Nos. 236, 244. The instant dispute focuses on the appropriateness of Defendants' attorney-client privilege invocation for communications that were not made to counsel or for communications that were copied to counsel. The Court hereby ORDERS Defendants to submit each of the subj
Summary: Order [Docket No. 222] NANCY J. KOPPE , Magistrate Judge . Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs' motion to compel. Docket No. 222. Defendants filed a response in opposition, and Plaintiffs filed a reply. Docket Nos. 236, 244. The instant dispute focuses on the appropriateness of Defendants' attorney-client privilege invocation for communications that were not made to counsel or for communications that were copied to counsel. The Court hereby ORDERS Defendants to submit each of the subje..
More
Order
[Docket No. 222]
NANCY J. KOPPE, Magistrate Judge.
Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs' motion to compel. Docket No. 222. Defendants filed a response in opposition, and Plaintiffs filed a reply. Docket Nos. 236, 244. The instant dispute focuses on the appropriateness of Defendants' attorney-client privilege invocation for communications that were not made to counsel or for communications that were copied to counsel. The Court hereby ORDERS Defendants to submit each of the subject documents to the Court for an in camera review. The documents shall be delivered to the undersigned's box in the Clerk's Office by January 23, 2019.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
