Filed: Jan. 02, 2013
Latest Update: Jan. 02, 2013
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE STAY OF ACTION PERMIT PARTIES TO ATTEND MEDIATION UNTIL JANUARY 31, 2013 JEFFREY S. WHITE, District Judge. WHEREAS the parties agreed to and the Court ordered a 90-day stay of this action until December 20, 2012, to allow the parties to attempt to explore a resolution of this matter; WHEREAS the parties have conducted two all-day mediation sessions with Judge William Cahill (Ret.) on December 7 and 13, 2012 and have a third session scheduled
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE STAY OF ACTION PERMIT PARTIES TO ATTEND MEDIATION UNTIL JANUARY 31, 2013 JEFFREY S. WHITE, District Judge. WHEREAS the parties agreed to and the Court ordered a 90-day stay of this action until December 20, 2012, to allow the parties to attempt to explore a resolution of this matter; WHEREAS the parties have conducted two all-day mediation sessions with Judge William Cahill (Ret.) on December 7 and 13, 2012 and have a third session scheduled o..
More
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO CONTINUE STAY OF ACTION PERMIT PARTIES TO ATTEND MEDIATION UNTIL JANUARY 31, 2013
JEFFREY S. WHITE, District Judge.
WHEREAS the parties agreed to and the Court ordered a 90-day stay of this action until December 20, 2012, to allow the parties to attempt to explore a resolution of this matter;
WHEREAS the parties have conducted two all-day mediation sessions with Judge William Cahill (Ret.) on December 7 and 13, 2012 and have a third session scheduled on January 10, 2013;
WHEREAS the parties do not want to expend resources in connection with discovery and other litigation issues while they are continuing to engage in the mediation process;
WHEREAS the parties believe that an additional stay of the litigation until January 31, 2013 will allow them to engage in a mediation process in an attempt to explore resolution of this matter;
NOW THEREFORE, it is stipulated that:
1. The stay of the litigation will continue until January 31, 2013;
2. The parties will advise the Court of their progress by February 6, 2013.
Dated: December 28, 2012 Respectfully submitted,
MANATT, PHELPS & PHILLIPS
By: /s/ Brad W. Selling
Brad W. Selling
Attorneys for Defendants
Brad W. Selling (State Bar No. 143515)
Andrew H. Struve (State Bar No. 200803)
Jessica L. Slusser (State Bar No. 217307)
Justin C. Johnson (State Bar No. 252175)
11355 West Olympic Boulevard
Los Angeles, CA 90064-1614
Telephone: (310) 312-4000
Facsimile: (310) 312-4224
Dated: December 28, 2012 Respectfully submitted,
STEBNER & ASSOCIATES
By: /s/ Kathrin Ann Stebner
Kathryn Ann Stebner
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Kathryn A. Stebner (State Bar No. 121088)
Sarah Colby (State Bar No. 194475)
870 Market Street, Suite 1212
San Francisco, CA 94102
Telephone: (415) 362-9800
Facsimile: (415) 362-9801
Dated: December 28, 2012 Respectfully submitted,
LIEFF, CABRASER, HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LLP
By: /s/ Lexi Hazam
Lexi J. Hazam
Attorneys for Plaintiffs
Robert J. Nelson (State Bar No. 132797)
Lexi J. Hazam (State Bar No. 224457)
LIEFF, CABRASER, HEIMANN & BERNSTEIN, LLP
275 Battery Street, 29th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111-3339
Telephone: (415) 956-1000
Facsimile: (415) 956-1008
Michael D. Thamer (State Bar No. 101440)
LAW OFFICES OF MICHAEL D. THAMER
Old Callahan School House
12444 South Highway 3; Post Office Box 1568
Callahan, CA 96014-5307
Christopher J. Healey (State Bar No. 105798)
LUCE, FORWARD, HAMILTON & SCRIPPS LLP
600 West Broadway, Suite 2600
San Diego, CA 92101
W. Timothy Needham (State Bar No. 96542)
Michael J. Crowley (State Bar No. 102343)
JANSSEN, MALLOY, NEEDHAM, MORRISON,
REINHOLTSEN & CROWLEY, LLP
730 Fifth Street
Eureka, CA 95501
Robert S. Arns (State Bar No. 65071)
Steven R. Weinmann (State Bar No. 190956)
THE ARNS LAW FIRM
515 Folsom Street, 3rd Floor
San Francisco, CA 94105
Attorneys for Plaintiffs ARLENE BETTENCOURT and
HARRY HARRISON
Filer's Attestation: Pursuant to General Order No. 45, Section X(B) regarding signatures, Brad W. Seiling hereby attests that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained.
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. AS MODIFIED ABOVE, IT IS SO ORDERED.
