Dillihant v. Contra Costa County, 16-cv-00220-JSC. (2018)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20181019i97
Visitors: 22
Filed: Oct. 16, 2018
Latest Update: Oct. 16, 2018
Summary: ORDER OF DISMISSAL Re: Dkt. No. 112 JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY , Magistrate Judge . The Court having been advised that the parties have agreed to a settlement of this case, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice; provided, however, that if any party hereto shall certify to this Court, within sixty (60) days, with proof of service of a copy thereon to opposing counsel, that the agreed consideration for said settlement has not been delivered over, the f
Summary: ORDER OF DISMISSAL Re: Dkt. No. 112 JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY , Magistrate Judge . The Court having been advised that the parties have agreed to a settlement of this case, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice; provided, however, that if any party hereto shall certify to this Court, within sixty (60) days, with proof of service of a copy thereon to opposing counsel, that the agreed consideration for said settlement has not been delivered over, the fo..
More
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
Re: Dkt. No. 112
JACQUELINE SCOTT CORLEY, Magistrate Judge.
The Court having been advised that the parties have agreed to a settlement of this case,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this case is dismissed in its entirety with prejudice; provided, however, that if any party hereto shall certify to this Court, within sixty (60) days, with proof of service of a copy thereon to opposing counsel, that the agreed consideration for said settlement has not been delivered over, the foregoing Order shall stand vacated and this case shall forthwith be restored to the calendar to be set for trial.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
