JOINT SUBMISSION REGARDING EXPEDITED BRIEFING SCHEDULE (Dkt. No. 90); ORDER

HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, JR., District Judge.

WHEREAS on June 14, 2018, Defendant filed a Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending Administrative Rulemaking (the "Motion to Stay," Dkt. 87);

WHEREAS the hearing on Defendant's Motion to Stay is set for September 13, 2018, at 2:00 p.m.;

WHEREAS on June 14, 2018, Defendant filed an Administrative Motion to Expedite the Hearing on the Stay Motion (the "Administrative Motion to Expedite Hearing," Dkt. 88) so that it may be heard concurrently with Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 67), which is already set to be heard on July 19, 2018, at 2:00 p.m.;

WHEREAS on June 15, 2018, the Court directed the Plaintiffs to file either an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to Defendant's Administrative Motion to Expedite Hearing and directed the parties to meet and confer and to submit a proposed expedited briefing schedule on Defendant's Motion to Stay (Dkt. 90);

WHEREAS on June 18, 2018, Plaintiffs filed a Statement of Non-Opposition to Defendant's Administrative Motion to Expedite (Dkt. 92);

WHEREAS the parties met and conferred in accordance with the Court's order and have reached a proposed expedited briefing schedule that accommodates defense counsel's pre-planned vacations;

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties through their counsel of record, subject to the approval of the Court, that

The parties do not seek to modify any other deadlines in the scheduling order at this time.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 5-1

Pursuant to N.D. Cal. Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other signatories.

ORDER

Pursuant to the foregoing stipulation and good cause appearing, it is hereby ORDERED that:

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.