Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Martinez v. County of Fresno, 1:18-CV-00793-LJO-BAM. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20190916588 Visitors: 22
Filed: Sep. 12, 2019
Latest Update: Sep. 12, 2019
Summary: STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING RECORDS PERTAINING TO DEPENDENT ADULT CONSERVATEE BARBARA A. McAULIFFE , Magistrate Judge . Subject to approval of this Court, defendants by and through counsel Bruce Berger and Michelle Pepper, and plaintiff through his counsel of record Thornton Davidson, hereby stipulate to the following protective order regarding information and records obtained and created in the course of providing intake, assessment, and services to dependent adult conservatee Ro
More

STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER REGARDING RECORDS PERTAINING TO DEPENDENT ADULT CONSERVATEE

Subject to approval of this Court, defendants by and through counsel Bruce Berger and Michelle Pepper, and plaintiff through his counsel of record Thornton Davidson, hereby stipulate to the following protective order regarding information and records obtained and created in the course of providing intake, assessment, and services to dependent adult conservatee Robert Camarillo:

1. The parties agree Robert Camarillo is a developmentally delayed dependent adult under a conservatorship and his acting Deputy Public Guardian is Stacy Mauro, deputy public guardian for the Fresno County Public Guardian.

2. Pursuant to California Welfare and Institutions Code section 4514 all information and records obtained in the course of providing intake, assessment, and services to persons with developmental disabilities shall be confidential and may only be disclosed under specific circumstances.

3. A dispute has arisen as to whether it is and was in the best interest of the conservatee to have visitation and/or contact with plaintiff Herardo Dionicio Martinez. In this lawsuit, Plaintiff Herardo Dionicio Martinez claims discrimination and his constitutional rights of free association are being violated by Robert Camarillo's conservator.

4. Notwithstanding the confidentiality of information and records obtained in the course of providing intake, assessment, and services to a person with developmental disabilities, namely Robert Camarillo, such information and records shall be disclosed as it is relevant and responsive to the relationship between Herardo Donicio Martinez and Robert Camarillo. Said "confidential material" may include employee narratives and Periodic Evaluations of Conservatee. The parties agree that information pertaining to Herardo Dionicio Martinez contained within employee narratives and Periodic Evaluations of Conservatee pertaining to the conservatorship of Robert Camarillo shall be produced if it is responsive to Plaintiff's discovery requests. The parties further agree that information on the documents which does not pertain to Plaintiff Martinez shall be redacted.

5. Any documents produced from Robert Camarillo's conservatorship file shall be considered and treated as confidential and may be disclosed or made available only to the Court, to counsel for the parties in this matter (including the paralegal, clerical, and secretarial staff employed by such counsel), and to the "qualified person" designated below:

a) Fresno County Risk Management on behalf of the Fresno County Board of Supervisors;

b) experts, consultants, psychologists, psychiatrists, or other health care professionals retained by such counsel to assist in the prosecution, defense, or settlement of this action;

c) court reporters employed in this action;

d) a witness at any deposition or other proceeding in this action; and

e) any other person as to whom the parties in writing agree.

6. Each "qualified person" to whom disclosure of the confidential material is made shall prior to the time of disclosure be provided by the person furnishing such materials a copy of this Order, and shall execute a nondisclosure agreement in the form of Attachment A, to be maintained by counsel.

7. Depositions shall be taken only in the presence of qualified persons. Deposition transcripts shall be considered confidential material.

8. If any confidential material, subject to this protective order, are included in any papers to be filed in Court, such papers shall be labeled "confidential — Subject to Court Order" and filed under seal until further order of this Court.

9. In the event that any of the above-described confidential material is used in any court proceeding in this action, it shall not lose its confidential status through such use, and the party using such shall take all reasonable steps to maintain its confidentiality during such use.

10. The execution of this Order shall not:

(a) constitute a waiver of any party's right to seek from the Court at a future time an order which provides greater, lesser, or no restriction of access to confidential material; or (b) be construed as an admission or agreement that any document designated as confidential material is, in fact, confidential or otherwise entitled to any protective relief except by virtue of this Protective Order.

11. Upon termination of this case, counsel for the parties shall assemble all protected records, all deposition transcripts, and all copies of same, and destroy these documents. Each party shall certify the destruction thereof.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Dated: 9/6/2019. STAMMER, McKNIGHT, BARNUM & BAILEY LLP ____________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________ ____________________________________________________________ /s/Michelle Pepper By_________________________________ Michelle Pepper, Attorneys for Defendants, COUNTY OF FRESNO, ANITA HARPER Dated: 9/6/2019 THORNTON DAVIDSON, P.C. By_____/s/Thornton Davidson Thornton Davidson, Attorneys for Plaintiff HERARDO DIONICIO MARTINEZ

____ ATTACHMENT A

NONDISCLOSURE AGREEMENT

I, ____________________ do solemnly swear that I am fully familiar with the terms of the Stipulated Protective Order entered in HERARDO DIONICIO MARTINEZ vs. COUNTY OF FRESNO; a Public Entity; ANITA HARPER, Deputy Public Guardian, and Does 1-15, inclusive, United State District Court, Eastern District of California Case No.: 1:18-CV-00793-LJO-BAM, and hereby agree to comply with and be bound by the terms and conditions of said Order unless and until modified by further Order of this Court. I hereby consent to the jurisdiction of said Court for purposes of enforcing this Order.

Dated: _______________ ___________________________ /s/

ORDER

The Court adopts the stipulated protective order submitted by the parties. The parties are advised that pursuant to the Local Rules of the United States District Court, Eastern District of California, any documents subject to this protective order to be filed under seal must be accompanied by a written request which complies with Local Rule 141 prior to sealing. The party making a request to file documents under seal shall be required to show good cause for documents attached to a non-dispositive motion or compelling reasons for documents attached to a dispositive motion. Pintos v. Pacific Creditors Ass'n, 605 F.3d 665, 677-78 (9th Cir. 2009). Within five (5) days of any approved document filed under seal, the party shall file a redacted copy of the sealed document. The redactions shall be narrowly tailored to protect only the information that is confidential or was deemed confidential. Additionally, the parties shall consider resolving any dispute arising under this protective order according to the Court's informal discovery dispute procedures.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer