EDWARD J. DAVILA, District Judge.
WHEREAS, on September 29, 2017, the Court entered an Order in this action granting in part and denying in part Defendant Intuit, Inc.'s ("Defendant") Motion To Dismiss Plaintiffs' Second Consolidated Amended Complaint (Dkt. 124; the "MTD Order");
WHEREAS, pursuant to the MTD Order, the Court directed that Plaintiffs Richard Brown and Christine Diaz may file an amended complaint by October 23, 2017 (Dkt. 124 at 11);
WHEREAS, Plaintiffs are working diligently on preparing an amended complaint, and have determined that a modest extension of time would be beneficial and would serve the interests of justice;
WHEREAS, counsel for Plaintiffs have conferred with counsel for Defendant, and the parties have agreed, subject to the Court's approval, to continue the deadline for Plaintiffs to file an amended complaint from October 23, 2017 to November 17, 2017;
WHEREAS, the parties have conferred and agreed to the following briefing schedule for any subsequent motion to dismiss Plaintiffs' Third Consolidated Amended Complaint, or for Defendant to answer should it elect not file a motion to dismiss:
WHEREAS, the requested continuance will not affect any other deadlines previously set by the Court;
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby stipulate and respectfully request that the deadline for Plaintiffs to file an amended complaint be continued from October 23, 2017, to November 17, 2017, and the Court set a briefing schedule for any subsequent motion to dismiss as outlined above.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), the filing attorney attests that she has obtained concurrence regarding the filing of this document from the signatories to the document.