Filed: May 23, 2018
Latest Update: May 23, 2018
Summary: ORDER ENLARGING TIME TO COMPLETE THIRD PARTY DISCOVERY AND TO CONDUCT THE DEPOSITION OF JERRY DE YOUNG ORDER SHEILA K. OBERTO , Magistrate Judge . On May 23, 2018, the parties appeared telephonically for a conference to resolve certain discovery issues. Plaintiff Agnes Xie appeared on her own behalf, and Jared Marshall, Esq., appeared on behalf of Defendant De Young Properties, 5418 L.P. After reviewing the parties' submissions and hearing the parties' arguments, and in recognition of Pla
Summary: ORDER ENLARGING TIME TO COMPLETE THIRD PARTY DISCOVERY AND TO CONDUCT THE DEPOSITION OF JERRY DE YOUNG ORDER SHEILA K. OBERTO , Magistrate Judge . On May 23, 2018, the parties appeared telephonically for a conference to resolve certain discovery issues. Plaintiff Agnes Xie appeared on her own behalf, and Jared Marshall, Esq., appeared on behalf of Defendant De Young Properties, 5418 L.P. After reviewing the parties' submissions and hearing the parties' arguments, and in recognition of Plai..
More
ORDER ENLARGING TIME TO COMPLETE THIRD PARTY DISCOVERY AND TO CONDUCT THE DEPOSITION OF JERRY DE YOUNG
ORDER
SHEILA K. OBERTO, Magistrate Judge.
On May 23, 2018, the parties appeared telephonically for a conference to resolve certain discovery issues. Plaintiff Agnes Xie appeared on her own behalf, and Jared Marshall, Esq., appeared on behalf of Defendant De Young Properties, 5418 L.P.
After reviewing the parties' submissions and hearing the parties' arguments, and in recognition of Plaintiff's status as a pro se litigant, the Court hereby grants Plaintiff yet another— and final—enlargement of time to complete certain non-expert discovery. Specifically, Plaintiff shall have until July 6, 2018, to: (1) attempt to obtain, in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 45, the information sought from third parties First American Title Company, Alma Fletcher, Mark Fletcher, and Tina Larson; and (2) conduct the deposition, in accordance with Fed. R. Civ. P. 30 or 31, of Jerry De Young.
This enlargement of time does not alter any other scheduling deadlines, including motion deadlines, the pretrial conference, and trial date. As noted above, no further extensions of time will be given, absent a showing of good cause. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b)(4).
IT IS SO ORDERED.