REPRO-MED SYSTEMS, INC. v. EMED TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION, 2:13-cv-1957 TLN CKD. (2016)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20160916g68
Visitors: 3
Filed: Sep. 15, 2016
Latest Update: Sep. 15, 2016
Summary: ORDER CAROLYN K. DELANEY , Magistrate Judge . Defendant's motion to compel came on regularly for hearing on September 14, 2016. John Lomas appeared telephonically for plaintiff. Eric Grant appeared for defendant. Upon review of the documents in support and opposition, upon hearing the arguments of counsel, and good cause appearing therefor, THE COURT ORDERS AS FOLLOWS: Defendant's motion to compel (ECF No. 107) is granted in part. Within seven days, plaintiff shall produce responsive docum
Summary: ORDER CAROLYN K. DELANEY , Magistrate Judge . Defendant's motion to compel came on regularly for hearing on September 14, 2016. John Lomas appeared telephonically for plaintiff. Eric Grant appeared for defendant. Upon review of the documents in support and opposition, upon hearing the arguments of counsel, and good cause appearing therefor, THE COURT ORDERS AS FOLLOWS: Defendant's motion to compel (ECF No. 107) is granted in part. Within seven days, plaintiff shall produce responsive docume..
More
ORDER
CAROLYN K. DELANEY, Magistrate Judge.
Defendant's motion to compel came on regularly for hearing on September 14, 2016. John Lomas appeared telephonically for plaintiff. Eric Grant appeared for defendant. Upon review of the documents in support and opposition, upon hearing the arguments of counsel, and good cause appearing therefor, THE COURT ORDERS AS FOLLOWS:
Defendant's motion to compel (ECF No. 107) is granted in part. Within seven days, plaintiff shall produce responsive documents that were generated prior to the litigation. Responsive documents generated after the initiation of the litigation shall be produced within twenty-one days. Documents responsive to requests nos. 57 and 58 may be limited to May 14, 2015 to the present.
Source: Leagle
