Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

SLACK v. INTERNATIONAL UNION OF OPERATING ENGINEERS, 3:13-CV-05001-EMC. (2014)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20141107758 Visitors: 30
Filed: Nov. 06, 2014
Latest Update: Nov. 06, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS' RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFFS' SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge. TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: This Stipulation is submitted pursuant to Local Rule 6-2 and the Court's August 19, 2014 Order and is entered into by and between all Plaintiffs and Defendants represented by the undersigned counsel (collectively, "Stipulating Defendants," and collectively, with Plaintiffs, the "Parties") for the purpo
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SETTING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS' RESPONSES TO PLAINTIFFS' SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT

EDWARD M. CHEN, District Judge.

TO ALL PARTIES AND THEIR ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:

This Stipulation is submitted pursuant to Local Rule 6-2 and the Court's August 19, 2014 Order and is entered into by and between all Plaintiffs and Defendants represented by the undersigned counsel (collectively, "Stipulating Defendants," and collectively, with Plaintiffs, the "Parties") for the purpose of efficiently managing this litigation involving numerous parties and complex issues.

1. The original Complaint in this matter was filed on October 27, 2013.

2. On March 10, 2014, pursuant to stipulation, the Court entered an Order Regarding Case Management Conference (the "March 10, 2014 Order") (Dkt. No. 54). In accordance with the deadlines set forth in the March 10, 2014 Order, Stipulating Defendants filed their respective Rule 12 motions directed to the FAC ("Rule 12 Motions") (Dkt. Nos. 99; 106; 107; 109/110; and 114/115/136), Plaintiffs filed their respective oppositions on May 22, 2014 (Dkt Nos. 145; 146; 147; 149; and 150), and Defendants filed their Replies on June 5, 2014 (Dkt Nos. 155-159).

3. The hearing on the Rule 12 Motions was held on July 10, 2014 before the Court, after which the Court took the Rule 12 Motions under submission (Dkt. No. 171).

4. On August 19, 2014, the Court entered an Order Granting Defendants' Motions to Dismiss with Leave to Amend (Dkt. No. 176). Pursuant to this Order, Plaintiffs' second amended complaint was to be filed within 60 days of the Order and, to the extent Defendants wished to bring future motions to dismiss, to coordinate and present one single motion.

5. Plaintiffs filed their Second Amended Complaint on October 20, 2014.

6. Accordingly, the Parties now respectfully ask the Court to enter the below deadlines in connection with future scheduling for this matter.

7. This Stipulation is not offered for any dilatory or improper purpose, but rather solely to effectively manage the scheduling of case events and to ensure the most efficient use of resources by the Court, the Parties, and their counsel as well as consider Parties' prior scheduling commitments.

STIPULATION

Pursuant to Local Rule 6-2 and the Court's August 19, 2014 Order, subject to the Court's approval, Plaintiffs and the Stipulating Defendants, desiring to efficiently manage this complex matter, hereby stipulate that:

1. Defendants' response to Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint (coordinated, if in the form of motions to dismiss) is to be filed no later than December 5, 2014. 2. Plaintiffs' opposition brief (if motions to dismiss are filed) to be filed no later than January 15, 2015. 3. Defendants' coordinated reply in support of any motions to dismiss, if filed, to be filed no later than January 29, 2015. 4. The hearing on Defendants' motion, if filed, to be held on February 12, 2015.

ORDER

Pursuant to the foregoing Stipulation of counsel and for good cause shown, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Parties adhere to the below schedule:

5. Defendants' response (coordinated, if in the form of motions to dismiss) to be filed no later than December 5, 2014. 6. Plaintiffs' opposition brief (if motions to dismiss are filed) to be filed no later than January 15, 2015. 7. Defendants' coordinated reply in support of any motions to dismiss, if filed, to be filed no later than January 29, 2015. 8. Hearing to be held on February 12, 2015.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer