Garcia v. Riaz, 2:15-CV-1869-JAM-DMC-P. (2019)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20190110898
Visitors: 3
Filed: Jan. 09, 2019
Latest Update: Jan. 09, 2019
Summary: ORDER DENNIS M. COTA , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. Pending before the court is plaintiff's notice (Doc. 26). According to plaintiff, while he served his opposition to defendant's motion for summary judgment on defendant, he inadvertently filed his opposition in the wrong court. Plaintiff's notice is construed as a motion for an extension of time to file his opposition in this court. So construed an
Summary: ORDER DENNIS M. COTA , Magistrate Judge . Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 1983. Pending before the court is plaintiff's notice (Doc. 26). According to plaintiff, while he served his opposition to defendant's motion for summary judgment on defendant, he inadvertently filed his opposition in the wrong court. Plaintiff's notice is construed as a motion for an extension of time to file his opposition in this court. So construed and..
More
ORDER
DENNIS M. COTA, Magistrate Judge.
Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court is plaintiff's notice (Doc. 26). According to plaintiff, while he served his opposition to defendant's motion for summary judgment on defendant, he inadvertently filed his opposition in the wrong court. Plaintiff's notice is construed as a motion for an extension of time to file his opposition in this court. So construed and good cause appearing therefor, the request is granted. Plaintiff may file his opposition within 30 days of the date of this order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
