Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. PEREZ, 14-MJ-00201-KJN. (2014)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20141015e78 Visitors: 8
Filed: Oct. 14, 2014
Latest Update: Oct. 14, 2014
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUE CONFERENCE KENDALL J. NEWMAN, Magistrate Judge. It is hereby stipulated and agreed to between the United States of America through AHMED MIAN, Assistant U.S. Attorney, and defendant DAWN PEREZ by and through her counsel, LINDA HARTER, Chief Assistant Federal Defender, that the status conference set for October 15, 2014 be continued to November 19, 2014 at 9:00 a.m. The continuance is requested to accommodate the schedules of the Court and the parties.
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO CONTINUE STATUE CONFERENCE

KENDALL J. NEWMAN, Magistrate Judge.

It is hereby stipulated and agreed to between the United States of America through AHMED MIAN, Assistant U.S. Attorney, and defendant DAWN PEREZ by and through her counsel, LINDA HARTER, Chief Assistant Federal Defender, that the status conference set for October 15, 2014 be continued to November 19, 2014 at 9:00 a.m.

The continuance is requested to accommodate the schedules of the Court and the parties. The additional time will be used to allow Ms. Perez additional time to obtain a driver's license through the California Department of Motor Vehicles. The parties stipulate that the Court should find the ends of justice served by the granting of such continuance outweigh the interests of the public and the defendant in a speedy trial.

Speedy trial time is to be excluded from the date of this order through the date of the status conference set for November 19, 2014 pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv) [reasonable time to prepare] (Local Code T4).

ORDER

The Court, having received, read, and considered the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing therefrom, adopts the stipulation of the parties in its entirety as its order. The Court specifically finds that the failure to grant a continuance in this case would deny counsel reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. The Court finds that the ends of justice to be served by granting the requested continuance outweigh the best interests of the public and defendants in a speedy trial.

The Court orders that the time from the date of the parties stipulation, October 15, 2014 up to and including November 19, 2014, shall be excluded from computation of time within which the trial of this case must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3161 (h)(7)(A) and (B)(iv) T4 [reasonable time for counsel to prepare] (Local Code T4). It is further ordered that the October 15, 2014 status conference shall be continued until November 19, 2014, at 9:00 a.m.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer