Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

DOUTHITT v. ACTING COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, 2:13-cv-00636-CMK. (2014)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20140605b83 Visitors: 10
Filed: Jun. 04, 2014
Latest Update: Jun. 04, 2014
Summary: DEFENDANT'S APPLICATION FOR AN EX PARTE ORDER EXTENDING DEFENDANT'S TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BY THIRTY (30) DAYS CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE BY MAIL CRAIG M. KELLISON, Magistrate Judge. Pursuant to Local Rule 144, Defendant, through counsel, hereby submits this application for an ex parte order extending Defendant's time to respond to Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment by thirty (30) days, i.e., up to and including June 30, 2014. Defendant files this appli
More

DEFENDANT'S APPLICATION FOR AN EX PARTE ORDER EXTENDING DEFENDANT'S TIME TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT BY THIRTY (30) DAYS CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE BY MAIL

CRAIG M. KELLISON, Magistrate Judge.

Pursuant to Local Rule 144, Defendant, through counsel, hereby submits this application for an ex parte order extending Defendant's time to respond to Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment by thirty (30) days, i.e., up to and including June 30, 2014. Defendant files this application ex parte because counsel has been unable to contact Plaintiff regarding a joint stipulation to a like extension. Counsel has called the telephone number listed for Plaintiff on the Court's docket, but there is no answer.

In Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment, she alleges that she submitted medical records that are not included in the administrative record. (Plaintiff did not allege this in her complaint.)

Counsel needs to investigate the allegedly missing records. This investigation will likely take some time, because it will involve queries to an agency field office as well as agency headquarters.

ORDER

In light of cause shown, the Court hereby grants ex parte Defendant's application for an extension of thirty (30) days, i.e., up to and including June 30, 2014, for Defendant to respond to Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer