Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Center for Biological Diversity v. Ilano, 2:16-cv-02322-VC. (2017)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20170313a22 Visitors: 4
Filed: Mar. 09, 2017
Latest Update: Mar. 09, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE VINCE G. CHHABRIA , District Judge . Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12 of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, the undersigned parties hereby stipulate to the following adjustments to the briefing schedule in this case, which would extend the deadline for defendant-intervenor's opening brief by three days without affecting other dates in this matter: Deadline
More

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE

Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-2 and 7-12 of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, the undersigned parties hereby stipulate to the following adjustments to the briefing schedule in this case, which would extend the deadline for defendant-intervenor's opening brief by three days without affecting other dates in this matter:

Deadline Current date New date Defendants' Cross-Motion for March 13, 2017 March 13, 2017 (no Summary Judgment and Memorandum change) in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment (25 pages or less); Defendant-Intervenor's Cross-Motion March 13, 2017 March 16, 2017 for Summary Judgment and Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment (15 pages or less) Plaintiffs' Combined Memorandum in April 3, 2017 April 3, 2017 (no change) Opposition to Defendants' and Defendant-Intervenor's Cross-Motions for Summary Judgment and Reply in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Summary Judgment (28 pages or less) Defendants' Reply in Support of their April 17, 2017 April 17, 2017 (no Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment change) (20 pages or less); Defendant-Intervenor's Reply in Support of its Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (10 pages or less) Hearing May 4, 2017 at 2:00 p.m. May 4, 2017 at 2:00 p.m. (no change)

The changes are requested as a result of two unexpected briefing deadlines in the Ninth Circuit for defendant-intervenor's counsel, which would otherwise conflict with preparation and filing of defendant-intervenor's opening brief. Slight staggering will also enable defendant-intervenor to better avoid unnecessary duplication of federal defendants' arguments.

The parties have not requested a previous continuance of the briefing schedule.

Accordingly, the parties request the Court approve this Stipulation, and enter the proposed changes to the briefing schedule in this matter.

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer