Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Tindle v. City of Daly City, 3:13-cv-02449-HSG (DMR). (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20160713b77 Visitors: 20
Filed: Jul. 12, 2016
Latest Update: Jul. 12, 2016
Summary: ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS' REQUEST FOR AN EXTENSION TO SET THE DEPOSITION SCHEDULE Re: Dkt. No. 169 DONNA M. RYU , Magistrate Judge . The court is in receipt of Defendants' request for a one-week extension to file the deposition schedule that was due today, July 12, 2016. [Docket No. 169.] The Defendants did not file a proposed order with this request. By 9:00 a.m. on July 13, 2016, the Defendants shall file a detailed proposed order setting forth their proposed process for setting the depositi
More

ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS' REQUEST FOR AN EXTENSION TO SET THE DEPOSITION SCHEDULE

Re: Dkt. No. 169

The court is in receipt of Defendants' request for a one-week extension to file the deposition schedule that was due today, July 12, 2016. [Docket No. 169.] The Defendants did not file a proposed order with this request. By 9:00 a.m. on July 13, 2016, the Defendants shall file a detailed proposed order setting forth their proposed process for setting the deposition schedule for this case, including a process for communicating directly with Plaintiff Sahleem Tindle to schedule his deposition.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer