Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Gokhale v. Dolby Laboratories, Inc., 3:17-cv-03845-JST. (2019)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20190429b43 Visitors: 16
Filed: Apr. 26, 2019
Latest Update: Apr. 26, 2019
Summary: STIPULATED ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION AND PROPOSED ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND CONTINUING HEARING ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO TAX COSTS AND FOR EXPERT WITNESS FEES AND ATTORNEYS' FEES (ECF No. 114) Civil L.R. 7-11, 7-12. JON S. TIGER , District Judge . Plaintiff Sushama Gokhale ("Plaintiff") and Defendants Dolby Laboratories, Inc., Jeffrey Fehervari, and Conroy Shum (collectively, "Defendants") (Plaintiffs and Defendants are collectively referred to herein as the "Parties") met and
More

STIPULATED ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION AND PROPOSED ORDER MODIFYING BRIEFING SCHEDULE AND CONTINUING HEARING ON DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO TAX COSTS AND FOR EXPERT WITNESS FEES AND ATTORNEYS' FEES (ECF No. 114)

Civil L.R. 7-11, 7-12.

Plaintiff Sushama Gokhale ("Plaintiff") and Defendants Dolby Laboratories, Inc., Jeffrey Fehervari, and Conroy Shum (collectively, "Defendants") (Plaintiffs and Defendants are collectively referred to herein as the "Parties") met and conferred and agreed submit this Stipulated Administrative Motion Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 7-11 and 7-12:

WHEREAS on April 10, 2019, Defendants filed a Motion to Tax Costs and for Expert Witness Fees and Attorneys' Fees (the "Motion"), noticing the Motion for hearing on May 16, 2019 (ECF No. 114);

WHEREAS Plaintiff is out of the country, making communication difficult;

WHEREAS the Parties agree and stipulate that a short extension of the briefing schedule on the motion is appropriate under the circumstances;

WHEREAS the Parties agree and stipulate to continue the hearing on the Motion one week, until May 23, 2019, which would provide the Court with additional time to consider the fully-briefed motion;

NOW THEREFORE, and good cause appearing, the parties stipulate to the following change in the briefing and hearing schedule for the Motion

Event Current Deadline Proposed Deadline Opposition Due April 24, 2019 April 26, 2019 Reply Due May 1, 2019 May 3, 2019 Hearing May 16, 2019, 2:00 p.m. May 23, 2019, 2:00 p.m.

IT IS SO STIPULATED, through Counsel of Record.

Dated: April 24, 2019 GREENSPOON MARDER LLP By: /s/ Gabriel G. Hedrick Anton N. Handal Gabriel G. Hedrick Attorneys for Plaintiff SUSHAMA GOKHALE Dated: April 24, 2019 SEYFARTH SHAW LLP By: /s/ Scott E. Atkinson Dana L. Peterson Chantelle C. Egan Scott E. Atkinson Attorneys for Defendants DOLBY LABORATORIES, INC.; JEFFREY FEHERVARI and CONROY SHUM

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer