Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

FERNANDEZ v. FRANKLIN CREDIT MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, Case No: 3:16-cv-02837-JCS. (2016)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20160603c28 Visitors: 11
Filed: Jun. 02, 2016
Latest Update: Jun. 02, 2016
Summary: STIPULATION EXTENDING DEADLINE TO FILE DEFENDANT'S RESPONSIVE PLEADING TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT. Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1. JOSEPH C. SPERO , District Judge . TO THE HONORABLE COURT AND ALL ATTORNEYS OF RECORD: PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaintiff DAVID FERNANDEZ ("Plaintiff"), and Defendant FRANKLIN CREDIT MANAGEMENT ("Defendant"), by and through their respective counsel of record, do hereby stipulate and agree as follows: 1. This matter was removed to the above Court on May 26, 2016.
More

STIPULATION EXTENDING DEADLINE TO FILE DEFENDANT'S RESPONSIVE PLEADING TO PLAINTIFF'S COMPLAINT.

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-1.

TO THE HONORABLE COURT AND ALL ATTORNEYS OF RECORD:

PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that Plaintiff DAVID FERNANDEZ ("Plaintiff"), and Defendant FRANKLIN CREDIT MANAGEMENT ("Defendant"), by and through their respective counsel of record, do hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

1. This matter was removed to the above Court on May 26, 2016.

2. Defendant's response to Plaintiff's Complaint is due June 2, 2016.

3. Counsel for Plaintiff and Defendant have engaged in preliminary settlement discussions, with the goal of providing an early resolution to this matter.

4. The Parties will require additional time to explore these settlement options, and would like to do so while limiting fees and costs incurred in litigation at this stage.

5. Accordingly, Plaintiff and Defendant agree that Defendant's deadline to respond to Plaintiff's Complaint shall be extended approximately 30 days to July 1, 2016.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer