Filed: Feb. 04, 2019
Latest Update: Feb. 04, 2019
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DEADLINE TO FILE DISCOVERY PLAN AND SCHEDULING ORDER CARL W. HOFFMAN , Magistrate Judge . STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DEADLINE TO FILE DISCOVERY PLAN AND SCHEDULING ORDER The parties, by and through their respective counsel of record, submit the following Stipulation And Order For Deadline To File Discovery Plan And Scheduling Order 1. On January 3, 2017, the Court granted the parties' request to stay the proceedings pending resolution of the Supreme Court of the
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DEADLINE TO FILE DISCOVERY PLAN AND SCHEDULING ORDER CARL W. HOFFMAN , Magistrate Judge . STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DEADLINE TO FILE DISCOVERY PLAN AND SCHEDULING ORDER The parties, by and through their respective counsel of record, submit the following Stipulation And Order For Deadline To File Discovery Plan And Scheduling Order 1. On January 3, 2017, the Court granted the parties' request to stay the proceedings pending resolution of the Supreme Court of the U..
More
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DEADLINE TO FILE DISCOVERY PLAN AND SCHEDULING ORDER
CARL W. HOFFMAN, Magistrate Judge.
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR DEADLINE TO FILE DISCOVERY PLAN AND SCHEDULING ORDER
The parties, by and through their respective counsel of record, submit the following Stipulation And Order For Deadline To File Discovery Plan And Scheduling Order
1. On January 3, 2017, the Court granted the parties' request to stay the proceedings pending resolution of the Supreme Court of the United States' review of the petition for writ of certiorari filed in Wynn Las Vegas, LLC v. Cesarz, Case Number 16-163 (ECF No. 13).
2. Such petition for writ of certiorari was denied by the Supreme Court of the United States. Wynn Las Vegas, LLC v. Cesarz, 138 S.Ct. 2670, 201 L. Ed. 2d 1071 (2018).
3. Following the denial of writ of certiorari in Cesarz, the parties have engaged in discussions regarding the status of litigation and the possibility of resolution.
4. The parties continue to engage in settlement discussions and are exploring the possibility of mediation.
5. The parties request a period of sixty days up to and including April 1, 2019 to file a proposed discovery plan and scheduling order should the parties not achieve resolution nor secure a mediation date in such time period.
6. This request is not sought for any improper purpose or other reason of delay. Rather, it is sought only to conserve expenditures and resources of this litigation while the parties engage in further settlement discussions efforts.
Wherefore, the parties respectfully request this court extend the current stay for a period of sixty days up to and including April 1, 2019, at which time parties will be required to file a proposed discovery plan and scheduling order.
IT IS SO ORDERED.