Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

PRIME HEALTHCARE SERVICES-SHASTA, LLC v. BURWELL, 2:15-CV-00154-TLN-DAD. (2015)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20150415924 Visitors: 15
Filed: Apr. 13, 2015
Latest Update: Apr. 13, 2015
Summary: SECOND STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE TO FILE A RESPONSIVE PLEADING [L.R. 144(a)] TROY L. NUNLEY , District Judge . Plaintiff Prime Healthcare Services — Shasta, LLC, and Defendant Sylvia Burwell, Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, by and through their attorneys, hereby stipulate, subject to approval of the Court, to extend the deadline for filing a responsive pleading to Plaintiff's Complaint from April 10, 2015, to June 5, 2015, in light of the followi
More

SECOND STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND THE DEADLINE TO FILE A RESPONSIVE PLEADING [L.R. 144(a)]

Plaintiff Prime Healthcare Services — Shasta, LLC, and Defendant Sylvia Burwell, Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services, by and through their attorneys, hereby stipulate, subject to approval of the Court, to extend the deadline for filing a responsive pleading to Plaintiff's Complaint from April 10, 2015, to June 5, 2015, in light of the following:

Plaintiff has filed a total of 8 cases challenging determinations by the Medicare Appeals Council that Plaintiff lacked standing to appeal the denial of its claims for payment for emergency medical services provided to 29 Medicare beneficiaries between November 2008 and February 2009. These cases are as follows:

(1) In Prime Healthcare Services — Shasta, LLC v. Burwell, 2:14-cv-02791-TLN-KJN, plaintiff challenges a determination by the Medicare Appeals Council, dated September 30, 2014, that it lacked standing to appeal the denial of its claims for payment for emergency medical services provided to 29 Medicare beneficiaries between November 2008 and February 2009. The deadline for Defendant's responsive pleading was March 13, 2013, but the parties filed a stipulation to extend that deadline to April 10, 2013.

(2) In Prime Healthcare Services — Shasta, LLC v. Burwell, 2:15-cv-00154-TLN-DAD, plaintiff challenges a determination by the Medicare Appeals Council, dated November 21, 2014, that it lacked standing to appeal the denial of its claims for payment for emergency medical services provided to 17 Medicare beneficiaries between November 2008 and February 2009. The deadline for Defendant's responsive pleading was March 30, 2013, but the parties filed a stipulation to extend that deadline to April 10, 2013.

(3) In Prime Healthcare Services — Shasta, LLC v. Burwell, 2:15-cv-00324-JAM-CMK, plaintiff challenges a determination by the Medicare Appeals Council, dated December 10, 2014, that it lacked standing to appeal the denial of its claims for payment for emergency medical services provided to 6 Medicare beneficiaries between November 2008 and February 2009. The deadline for Defendant's responsive pleading is May 4, 2015.

(4) In Prime Healthcare Services — Shasta, LLC v. Burwell, 2:15-cv-00400-TLN-CMK, plaintiff challenges a determination by the Medicare Appeals Council, dated December 23, 2014, that it lacked standing to appeal the denial of its claims for payment for emergency medical services provided to 10 Medicare beneficiaries between November 2008 and February 2009. The deadline for Defendant's responsive pleading is May 4, 2015.

(5) In Prime Healthcare Services — Shasta, LLC v. Burwell, 2:15-cv-00450-KJM-CKD, plaintiff challenges a determination by the Medicare Appeals Council, dated December 29, 2014, that it lacked standing to appeal the denial of its claims for payment for emergency medical services provided to 18 Medicare beneficiaries between November 2008 and February 2009. The deadline for Defendant's responsive pleading is May 29, 2015.

(6) In Prime Healthcare Services — Shasta, LLC v. Burwell, 2:15-cv-00473-MCE—CMK, plaintiff challenges a determination by the Medicare Appeals Council, dated January 2, 2015, that it lacked standing to appeal the denial of its claims for payment for emergency medical services provided to 19 Medicare beneficiaries between November 2008 and February 2009. The deadline for Defendant's responsive pleading is May 29, 2015.

(7) In Prime Healthcare Services — Shasta, LLC v. Burwell, 2:15-cv-00474-MCE—CMK, plaintiff challenges a determination by the Medicare Appeals Council, dated January 2, 2015, that it lacked standing to appeal the denial of its claims for payment for emergency medical services provided to 7 Medicare beneficiaries between November 2008 and February 2009. The deadline for Defendant's responsive pleading is May 29, 2015.

(8) In Prime Healthcare Services — Shasta, LLC v. Burwell, 2:15-cv-00709-TLN-KJN, plaintiff challenges a determination by the Medicare Appeals Council, dated December 29, 2015, that it lacked standing to appeal the denial of its claims for payment for emergency medical services provided to 25 Medicare beneficiaries between November 2008 and February 2009. The deadline for Defendant's responsive pleading is June 2, 2015.

The 8 cases are related because they involve the same parties and present the same legal issue — whether Medicare Appeals Council correctly determined that plaintiff lacked standing to appeal the denial of its claims for payment for emergency medical services provided to various beneficiaries between November 2008 and February 2009. The parties believe that, in the interest of economy and efficiency, it makes sense to have a single responsive pleading deadline for all eight cases and, accordingly, respectfully ask the Court to extend the deadline for the Defendant's responsive pleading to June 5, 2015.

ORDER

Pursuant to stipulation and good cause having been shown, IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer