MALICO, INC. v. COOLER MASTER USA INC., 3:11-cv-04537 RS. (2013)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20130521814
Visitors: 20
Filed: May 16, 2013
Latest Update: May 16, 2013
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge. Plaintiff Malico Inc. ("Malico") and Defendants Cooler Master USA Inc. ("Cooler Master") and LSI Corp. ("LSI"), by and through their respective counsel of record, stipulate as follows: During the deposition of Robert Liang, an issue arose that ultimately prevented the deposition from continuing. Counsel for the parties have met and conferred to attempt to resolve the issue t
Summary: STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge. Plaintiff Malico Inc. ("Malico") and Defendants Cooler Master USA Inc. ("Cooler Master") and LSI Corp. ("LSI"), by and through their respective counsel of record, stipulate as follows: During the deposition of Robert Liang, an issue arose that ultimately prevented the deposition from continuing. Counsel for the parties have met and conferred to attempt to resolve the issue to..
More
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING JOINT MOTION FOR ADMINISTRATIVE RELIEF
RICHARD SEEBORG, District Judge.
Plaintiff Malico Inc. ("Malico") and Defendants Cooler Master USA Inc. ("Cooler Master") and LSI Corp. ("LSI"), by and through their respective counsel of record, stipulate as follows:
During the deposition of Robert Liang, an issue arose that ultimately prevented the deposition from continuing. Counsel for the parties have met and conferred to attempt to resolve the issue to allow settlement discussions to continue, but were unsuccessful. Malico contemplates filing a motion that if granted or denied would resolve the dispute. An expedited schedule for the Malico's motion is necessary because neither can settlement discussions continue nor can the litigation go forward as contemplated by the Case Management Scheduling Order until the current dispute is resolved. Therefore, the parties respectfully ask the Court to order as follows:
(1) Malico shall file its motion including points and authorities and any supporting papers within one court day of receiving the Court's order on the Joint Motion for Administrative Relief. The motion shall not exceed three pages;
(2) Defendants shall file their opposition and any supporting papers within two court days of service by ECF of Malico's motion to disqualify. The opposition brief shall not exceed three pages;
(3) The Court may rule on the motion without the need for a hearing unless the Court determines that a hearing would assist the Court;
In the alternative, the parties request that the Court set a telephone conference to discuss how the dispute may be expeditiously resolved or take such other action as the Court deems proper to enable this action to proceed.
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
