STIPULATION AND ORDER TO RESCHEDULE ARGUMENT ON MOTION TO DISMISS

WILLIAM H. ORRICK, District Judge.

Pursuant to paragraph 1(d) of the Honorable William H. Orrick's Case Management Conference Order (Dkt. 20) and L.R. 6-1(b), 6-2, and 7-12, Plaintiffs Sherida Johnson, Harry Gunsenhouser, and Subrina Seenarain ("Plaintiffs") and Defendant Nissan North America ("NNA") (collectively, the "Parties") enter into this stipulation with reference to the following facts and recitals:

WHEREAS, Plaintiffs filed their Second Amended Complaint ("SAC") on September 18, 2017 (Dkt. 56);

WHEREAS, NNA filed its Motion to Dismiss the SAC on October 23, 2017 (Dkt.59);

WHEREAS Plaintiffs filed their opposition to the Motion to Dismiss on November 13, 2017 (Dkt 62) and NNA's filed its reply be filed on November 29, 2017 (Dkt 64);

WHEREAS, the Court entered an order scheduling argument on the Motion to Dismiss on January 3, 2018 (Dkt 61); and

WHEREAS, one of Plaintiffs' lead counsel will be out of the country on that date on a long-standing, previously scheduled holiday vacation and respectfully requests that argument be rescheduled to January 31, 2018;

Plaintiffs and NNA stipulate and agree as follows and request the Court enter an Order as follows:

1. Argument on NNA's Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint shall be held on January 31, 2018;

2. The requested modification will not impact the current case schedule

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

Pursuant to L.R. 5-1(i), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from the other signatories.

ORDER

Pursuant to the parties' stipulation, the Court hereby orders as follows:

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.