Mariscal v. AT&T Mobility Services, LLC, 1:17-cv-00688-DAD-EPG. (2018)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20180220f08
Visitors: 37
Filed: Feb. 16, 2018
Latest Update: Feb. 16, 2018
Summary: STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND ORDER ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE CASE ERICA P. GROSJEAN , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties to this action, by and through their respective counsel of record, that the entire action shall be dismissed with prejudice as to all parties pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Each party is to bear its own costs and fees. ORDER On February 15, 2018, the
Summary: STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND ORDER ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE CASE ERICA P. GROSJEAN , Magistrate Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties to this action, by and through their respective counsel of record, that the entire action shall be dismissed with prejudice as to all parties pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Each party is to bear its own costs and fees. ORDER On February 15, 2018, the p..
More
STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE AND ORDER
ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE CASE
ERICA P. GROSJEAN, Magistrate Judge.
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the parties to this action, by and through their respective counsel of record, that the entire action shall be dismissed with prejudice as to all parties pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Each party is to bear its own costs and fees.
ORDER
On February 15, 2018, the parties filed a stipulation to dismiss this action with prejudice. (ECF No. 25.) All parties have agreed to the dismissal. In light of the stipulation, the case has ended, see Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 1997), and is dismissed with prejudice. Concha v. London, 62 F.3d 1493, 1506 (9th Cir. 1995). Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is DIRECTED to close this case.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
