Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

U.S. v. HOLMES, 14-cr-317 MCE. (2015)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20150610b09 Visitors: 5
Filed: Jun. 08, 2015
Latest Update: Jun. 08, 2015
Summary: STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTININUING STATUS CONFERENCE AND EXCLUDING TIME MORRISON C. ENGLAND, Jr. , Chief District Judge . IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective counsel, Michele Beckwith, Assistant United States Attorney, attorney for Plaintiff, Heather Williams, Federal Defender, through Assistant Federal Defender Matthew C. Bockmon, attorney for Michael Holmes that the status conference hearing date of June 11, 2015 be vacated, and the matter be
More

STIPULATION AND ORDER CONTININUING STATUS CONFERENCE AND EXCLUDING TIME

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED by and between the parties hereto through their respective counsel, Michele Beckwith, Assistant United States Attorney, attorney for Plaintiff, Heather Williams, Federal Defender, through Assistant Federal Defender Matthew C. Bockmon, attorney for Michael Holmes that the status conference hearing date of June 11, 2015 be vacated, and the matter be set for status conference on July 30, 2015 at 9:00 a.m.

The continuance is requested for further case investigation by both parties, to allow both parties to construct a resolution and for defense counsel to meet and confer with the defendant regarding the resolution of this case.

Based upon the foregoing, the parties agree time under the Speedy Trial Act should be excluded of this order's date through and including July 30, 2015; pursuant to 18 U.S.C. §3161 (h)(7)(A)and (B)(iv)[reasonable time to prepare] and General Order 479, Local Code T4 based upon continuity of counsel and defense preparation.

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, the Court, having received, read, and considered the parties' stipulation, and good cause appearing therefrom, adopts the parties' stipulation in its entirety as its order. The Court specifically finds the failure to grant a continuance in this case would deny counsel reasonable time necessary for effective preparation, taking into account the exercise of due diligence. The Court finds the ends of justice are served by granting the requested continuance and outweigh the best interests of the public and defendant in a speedy trial.

The Court orders the time from the date the parties stipulated, up to and including July 30, 2015, shall be excluded from computation of time within which the trial of this case must be commenced under the Speedy Trial Act, pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3161(h)(7)(A) and(B)(iv) [reasonable time for counsel to prepare] and General Order 479, (Local Code T4). It is further ordered the June 11, 2015 status conference shall be continued until July 30, 2015, at 9:00 a.m.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer