Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

STRICKLAND v. LOS ANGELES SOUTHWEST POLICE DEPARTMENT, CV 10-2973-SJO (PLA). (2012)

Court: District Court, C.D. California Number: infdco20120224920 Visitors: 18
Filed: Feb. 20, 2012
Latest Update: Feb. 20, 2012
Summary: ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION S. JAMES OTERO, District Judge. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the entire file de novo, including the magistrate judge's final report and recommendation. The Court agrees with the recommendations of the magistrate judge. ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED: 1. The final report and recommendation is adopted. 2. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is granted: (a) with respect to plaintiff's federal claim(s), apart from hi
More

ORDER ADOPTING MAGISTRATE JUDGE'S FINAL REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

S. JAMES OTERO, District Judge.

Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the entire file de novo, including the magistrate judge's final report and recommendation. The Court agrees with the recommendations of the magistrate judge.

ACCORDINGLY, IT IS ORDERED:

1. The final report and recommendation is adopted. 2. Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is granted: (a) with respect to plaintiff's federal claim(s), apart from his claims alleging the excessive use of force, without leave to amend but without prejudice as barred by Heck; and (b) dismissing his claim(s) alleging the excessive use of force without leave to amend and with prejudice for failure to state a claim. 3. The Court declines to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over any state law claims that plaintiff may be purporting to raise without prejudice to plaintiff filing such claims in state court. 4. Judgment shall be entered consistent with this order. 5. The clerk shall serve this order and the judgment on all counsel or parties of record.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer