JOINT STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER IN RESPONSE TO DECEMBER 11, 2017 COURT ORDER REQUESTING REDACTIONS

EDWARD J. DAVILA, District Judge.

In response to the Court's Order of December 11, 2017 (Dkt. No. 216), Plaintiff Microsoft Corporation ("Microsoft") and Defendants Corel Corporation and Corel, Inc. (collectively, "Corel") have met and conferred about whether the Court's recent orders (Dkt. Nos. 213-15) should be redacted. The parties have agreed and are submitting the attached redacted version of the Order granting Microsoft's motion for partial summary judgment (Dkt. No. 214). The redacted portions of the Order should be sealed for the reasons set forth in the Declaration of Domingo M. LLagostera In Support of Corel's Administrative Motion to File Documents Under Seal, ¶¶ 4-5 (Dkt. No. 187-1). The parties' request is narrowly tailored to seal only information that has been designated confidential pursuant to the Protective Order.

The parties have further agreed that the Order granting Corel's motion to exclude opinions of Microsoft's damages expert (Dkt. No. 213) and the Order denying Corel's motion for leave to file a motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 215) require no redactions and may be unsealed in their entirety. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED:

FILER'S ATTESTATION

Pursuant to Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the filing of the document has been obtained from the other Signatory.

ORDER

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.