SUTHERLAND v. FRANCIS, 12-CV-05110-LHK. (2016)
Court: District Court, N.D. California
Number: infdco20160610b19
Visitors: 11
Filed: Jun. 09, 2016
Latest Update: Jun. 09, 2016
Summary: ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO FILE A CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT LUCY H. KOH , District Judge . The parties have failed to file a Joint Case Management Statement 7 days in advance of the Case Management Conference set for June 15, 2016 at 2 p.m. See Civ. L.R. 16-10(d). However, Defendant Thomas Francis ("Defendant") filed a declaration stating that Defendant had attempted to meet and confer with Plaintiff Richard Sutherland ("Plaintiff") and received no response. ECF No. 58. Plaintiff is her
Summary: ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO FILE A CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT LUCY H. KOH , District Judge . The parties have failed to file a Joint Case Management Statement 7 days in advance of the Case Management Conference set for June 15, 2016 at 2 p.m. See Civ. L.R. 16-10(d). However, Defendant Thomas Francis ("Defendant") filed a declaration stating that Defendant had attempted to meet and confer with Plaintiff Richard Sutherland ("Plaintiff") and received no response. ECF No. 58. Plaintiff is here..
More
ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO FILE A CASE MANAGEMENT STATEMENT
LUCY H. KOH, District Judge.
The parties have failed to file a Joint Case Management Statement 7 days in advance of the Case Management Conference set for June 15, 2016 at 2 p.m. See Civ. L.R. 16-10(d). However, Defendant Thomas Francis ("Defendant") filed a declaration stating that Defendant had attempted to meet and confer with Plaintiff Richard Sutherland ("Plaintiff") and received no response. ECF No. 58. Plaintiff is hereby ORDERED to file a case management statement by Monday, June 13, 2016, at 10:00 a.m. The Statement must "report[] progress or changes since the last statement was filed and mak[e] proposals for the remainder of the case development process." Id.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Source: Leagle
