Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Malone v. Saul, 2:19-cv-00150-APG-NJK. (2020)

Court: District Court, D. Nevada Number: infdco20200221d26 Visitors: 25
Filed: Feb. 19, 2020
Latest Update: Feb. 19, 2020
Summary: Order Accepting Report and Recommendation, Denying Motion to Remand, and Granting Motion to Affirm [ECF Nos. 35, 36, 41] ANDREW P. GORDON , District Judge . On February 3, 2020, Magistrate Judge Koppe recommended that I deny plaintiff Bonni Malone's motion to remand and grant the defendant's motion to affirm. ECF No. 41. Malone did not file an objection. Thus, I am not obligated to conduct a de novo review of the report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1) (requiring district courts t
More

Order Accepting Report and Recommendation, Denying Motion to Remand, and Granting Motion to Affirm

[ECF Nos. 35, 36, 41]

On February 3, 2020, Magistrate Judge Koppe recommended that I deny plaintiff Bonni Malone's motion to remand and grant the defendant's motion to affirm. ECF No. 41. Malone did not file an objection. Thus, I am not obligated to conduct a de novo review of the report and recommendation. 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) (requiring district courts to "make a de novo determination of those portions of the report or specified proposed findings to which objection is made"); United States v. Reyna-Tapia, 328 F.3d 1114, 1121 (9th Cir. 2003) (en banc) ("the district judge must review the magistrate judge's findings and recommendations de novo if objection is made, but not otherwise" (emphasis in original)).

I THEREFORE ORDER that Magistrate Judge Koppe's report and recommendation (ECF No. 41) is accepted, plaintiff Bonni Malone's motion to remand (ECF No. 35) is DENIED, and the defendant's motion to affirm (ECF No. 36) is GRANTED. The clerk of court is instructed to enter judgment accordingly and to close this case.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer