Shaver v. Sherman, 2:17-07429 JLS (ADS). (2020)
Court: District Court, C.D. California
Number: infdco20200127862
Visitors: 10
Filed: Jan. 19, 2020
Latest Update: Jan. 19, 2020
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOSEPHINE L. STATON , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus [Dkt. No. 1], the Answer to the Petition [Dkt. No. 10], all the records and files herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the assigned United States Magistrate Judge dated October 29, 2019 [Dkt. No. 14]. No objections to the Report and Recommendation were filed. As such, after thorou
Summary: ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE JOSEPHINE L. STATON , District Judge . Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus [Dkt. No. 1], the Answer to the Petition [Dkt. No. 10], all the records and files herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the assigned United States Magistrate Judge dated October 29, 2019 [Dkt. No. 14]. No objections to the Report and Recommendation were filed. As such, after thoroug..
More
ORDER ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
JOSEPHINE L. STATON, District Judge.
Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636, the Court has reviewed the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus [Dkt. No. 1], the Answer to the Petition [Dkt. No. 10], all the records and files herein, and the Report and Recommendation of the assigned United States Magistrate Judge dated October 29, 2019 [Dkt. No. 14]. No objections to the Report and Recommendation were filed. As such, after thorough analysis and consideration of the Report and Recommendation, the Court concurs with and accepts the findings, conclusions and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED:
1. The United States Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation, [Dkt. No. 14], is accepted;
2. The Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is dismissed with prejudice;
3. A certificate of appealability is denied; and
4. Judgment is to be entered accordingly.
Source: Leagle
