Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

United States v. Richard Lee Blaylock, Jr., 00-11254 (2001)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 00-11254 Visitors: 15
Filed: May 02, 2001
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Richard Lee BLAYLOCK, Jr., Defendant-Appellant. United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Alexander Petrillo, a.k.a. Alexander Pertillo, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 00-11254, 00-11255. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. Aug. 1, 2001. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama (No. 99-00130-CR); C. Lynwood Smith, Jr., Judge. (Opinion May 2, 2001, 249 F.3d 1298 , 11th Cir., 2001) Before AND
More
                            UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
                                                      v.

                           Richard Lee BLAYLOCK, Jr., Defendant-Appellant.

                               United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
                                                      v.

                    Alexander Petrillo, a.k.a. Alexander Pertillo, Defendant-Appellant.

                                         Nos. 00-11254, 00-11255.

                                      United States Court of Appeals,
                                              Eleventh Circuit.

                                                Aug. 1, 2001.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Alabama (No. 99-00130-CR); C.
Lynwood Smith, Jr., Judge.
(Opinion May 2, 2001, 
249 F.3d 1298
, 11th Cir., 2001)

Before ANDERSON, Chief Judge, and TJOFLAT, EDMONDSON, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES,
BARKETT, HULL, MARCUS and WILSON Circuit Judges.*

        BY THE COURT:
        A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion of rehearing en

banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing
en banc,
        IT IS ORDERED that the above causes shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel's

opinion is hereby VACATED.




    *
    Senior U.S. Circuit Judge Emmett R. Cox may elect to participate in further proceedings in this
matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 46(c).

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer