Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Daniel Welzel v. Advocate Realty Investments, 99-14875 (2001)

Court: Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit Number: 99-14875 Visitors: 11
Filed: Jun. 29, 2001
Latest Update: Feb. 21, 2020
Summary: In re Daniel A. WELZEL, Debtor. Advocate Realty Investments, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, Kenneth L. Royal, Plaintiff, v. Daniel A. Welzel, Defendant-Appellee. In re Daniel A. Welzel, Debtor. Advocate Realty Investments, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant, Kenneth L. Royal, Plaintiff, v. Daniel A. Welzel, Defendant-Appellee. Nos. 99-14875, 99-14876. United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit. Aug. 7, 2001. Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia (No. 99-00142-
More
                                     In re Daniel A. WELZEL, Debtor.

                          Advocate Realty Investments, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant,
                                        Kenneth L. Royal, Plaintiff,

                                                      v.

                                  Daniel A. Welzel, Defendant-Appellee.
                                       In re Daniel A. Welzel, Debtor.

                          Advocate Realty Investments, LLC, Plaintiff-Appellant,

                                        Kenneth L. Royal, Plaintiff,

                                                      v.
                                  Daniel A. Welzel, Defendant-Appellee.

                                         Nos. 99-14875, 99-14876.

                                      United States Court of Appeals,
                                              Eleventh Circuit.

                                                Aug. 7, 2001.
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Georgia (No. 99-00142-CV-4);
John F. Nangle, Judge.
(Opinion June 29, 2001, 
245 F.3d 1283
, 11th Cir., 2001)
Before ANDERSON, Chief Judge, TJOFLAT, EDMONDSON, BIRCH, DUBINA, BLACK, CARNES,
BARKETT, HULL, MARCUS and WILSON, Circuit Judges.*

        BY THE COURT:
        A member of this court in active service having requested a poll on the suggestion of rehearing en

banc and a majority of the judges in this court in active service having voted in favor of granting a rehearing

en banc,
        IT IS ORDERED that the above causes shall be reheard by this court en banc. The previous panel's

opinion is hereby VACATED.




    *
    Senior U.S. Circuit Judge Emmett R. Cox has elected to participate in further proceedings in this
matter pursuant to 28 U.S.C. ยง 46(c).

Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer