Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Kenney v. United States, 1:12-CR-0266 AWI. (2019)

Court: District Court, E.D. California Number: infdco20190822a31 Visitors: 11
Filed: Aug. 21, 2019
Latest Update: Aug. 21, 2019
Summary: ORDER FOR THE UNITED STATES TO FILE A SUR-REPLY ANTHONY W. ISHII , Senior District Judge . On July 15, 2019, Petitioner through counsel filed a reply to the United States' opposition to his 28 U.S.C. 2255 petition. See Doc. No. 172. After further review, the Court finds that it would be beneficial for the United States to file a sur-reply. Although the Court will not limit the scope of the sur-reply, the sur-reply shall particularly address Section II of Petitioner's Reply (pages 6 to 1
More

ORDER FOR THE UNITED STATES TO FILE A SUR-REPLY

On July 15, 2019, Petitioner through counsel filed a reply to the United States' opposition to his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 petition. See Doc. No. 172. After further review, the Court finds that it would be beneficial for the United States to file a sur-reply. Although the Court will not limit the scope of the sur-reply, the sur-reply shall particularly address Section II of Petitioner's Reply (pages 6 to 11).

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within twenty-one (21) days of service of this order, Respondent shall file a sur-reply to Petitioner's Reply.1

IT IS SO ORDERED.

FootNotes


1. If, following the filing of the sur-reply, Petitioner wishes to file a response, he may file a request with the Court for permission to file a further response that explains why further briefing would be beneficial.
Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer