JACKSON v. WARDEN OF CALIFORNIA STATE PRISON, SOLANO, 2:14-cv-2268 MCE DAD P. (2015)
Court: District Court, E.D. California
Number: infdco20150821b72
Visitors: 5
Filed: Aug. 20, 2015
Latest Update: Aug. 20, 2015
Summary: ORDER MORRISON C. ENGLAND, Jr. , Chief Magistrate Judge . Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding through counsel, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On July 27, 2015, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to
Summary: ORDER MORRISON C. ENGLAND, Jr. , Chief Magistrate Judge . Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding through counsel, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On July 27, 2015, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to ..
More
ORDER
MORRISON C. ENGLAND, Jr., Chief Magistrate Judge.
Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding through counsel, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302.
On July 27, 2015, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on all parties and which contained notice to all parties that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Neither party has filed objections to the findings and recommendations.
The court has reviewed the file and finds the findings and recommendations to be supported by the record and by the magistrate judge's analysis. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:
1. The findings and recommendations filed July 27, 2015, are adopted in full; and
2. Petitioner's motion for a stay and abeyance (Doc. No. 13) is denied.
Source: Leagle
