Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

Ross v. White, 2:17-cv-04149-ODW (JC). (2018)

Court: District Court, C.D. California Number: infdco20180614719 Visitors: 8
Filed: Jun. 12, 2018
Latest Update: Jun. 12, 2018
Summary: PARTIAL JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS AND AGAINST CRAIG ROSS OTIS D. WRIGHT, II , District Judge . Plaintiffs Craig Ross and Natalie Operstein initiated this suit on June 2, 2017. (ECF No. 1.) Several groups of Defendants moved to dismiss Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint. (ECF Nos. 87, 89, 119.) On April 20, 2018, the Court granted Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, without leave to amend, as it pertains to all of Plaintiff Craig Ross's claims. (Order, ECF No. 146.) On June 12, 2018, the
More

PARTIAL JUDGMENT IN FAVOR OF DEFENDANTS AND AGAINST CRAIG ROSS

Plaintiffs Craig Ross and Natalie Operstein initiated this suit on June 2, 2017. (ECF No. 1.) Several groups of Defendants moved to dismiss Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint. (ECF Nos. 87, 89, 119.) On April 20, 2018, the Court granted Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, without leave to amend, as it pertains to all of Plaintiff Craig Ross's claims. (Order, ECF No. 146.) On June 12, 2018, the Court denied Ross's Motion for Reconsideration. (ECF No. 185.)

It is therefore ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED as follows:

1. Craig Ross shall take nothing by his complaint against Defendants.

2. Ross's claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE, in their entirety, as to all Defendants.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer