Elawyers Elawyers
Washington| Change

Aboudara v. City of Santa Rosa, 17-CV-01661-HSG. (2017)

Court: District Court, N.D. California Number: infdco20170711817 Visitors: 11
Filed: Jul. 10, 2017
Latest Update: Jul. 10, 2017
Summary: STIPULATION TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR CONDITIONAL CERTIFICATION; ORDER [Civil Local Rule 6-2] HAYWOOD S. GILLIAM, Jr. , District Judge . STIPULATION TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE Plaintiffs Timothy Aboudara, Jr., et al. filed their Motion for Conditional Certification and Facilitated Notice on June 30, 2017. (Dkt. 24.) Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-3(a), Defendant City of Santa Rosa's opposition is due on July 14, 2017. Defendant's lead counsel is out of the cou
More

STIPULATION TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON PLAINTIFFS' MOTION FOR CONDITIONAL CERTIFICATION; ORDER

[Civil Local Rule 6-2]

STIPULATION TO EXTEND BRIEFING SCHEDULE

Plaintiffs Timothy Aboudara, Jr., et al. filed their Motion for Conditional Certification and Facilitated Notice on June 30, 2017. (Dkt. 24.) Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-3(a), Defendant City of Santa Rosa's opposition is due on July 14, 2017. Defendant's lead counsel is out of the country on a previously-scheduled vacation and will not return to the office until July 17, 2017. The time for Defendant to respond to the motion has been further impacted by the Fourth of July holiday.

The parties stipulate and hereby respectfully request that the Court continue the deadline for the filing of Defendant's opposition to July 28, 2017, and continue the deadline for the filing of Plaintiffs' reply to August 4, 2017. The parties do not seek a continuance of the hearing date, and request that the motion be heard on August 31, 2017.

The parties further stipulate and hereby respectfully request that should the Court continue the hearing, the statute of limitations for all putative plaintiffs subject to the motion for conditional certification and facilitated notice be tolled from August 31, 2017, until the date this Court issues an Order granting or denying Plaintiff's motion.

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO LOCAL RULE 5-1

Pursuant to N.D. Cal. Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other signatories.

Dated: July 10, 2017 By: /s/Kevin P. McLaughlin KEVIN P. McLAUGHLIN

ORDER

The Court, having considered the Stipulation of tthe parties, and good cause appearing therefore, hereby orders that the deadline for the filing of Defendant's opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Conditional Certification and Facilitated Notice is continued to July 28, 2017, and the deadline for the filing of Plaintiffs' reply is continued to August 4, 2017. The hearing date of August 31, 2017 remains unchanged.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Source:  Leagle

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer